In the ages gone by, our ancestors did not have wealth
so much so that sharing a meal with his fellow neighbours was a
costly affair. Going to the field was not safe; headhunters from the
neighbouring villages might launch an ambush. Nature was harsh, and
he did not have medicine to get back his health whenever an illness
strikes him; he has to wait and let natural course have its way
towards recovery or death. Rivers and monsoon rain were not
domesticated and therefore irrigation system was poor. When taken
little more of rice beer, that drunken state makes him unfit to
plough his field. All of these factors made our ancestors poor. In
such widespread shortage of wealthy ones, to have earned the status
of a generous man who could feed the whole village was indeed an
honour. It was truly a feast of merit.
It seems that the hangover continues; the search for
honour lives on. But this times the feast is dished out during
marriage. Not every marriage feast is about seeking honour, but not
every marriage feast is also about generosity. The individual knows
best the motives behind the action. The bigger question, however,
that requires reflection is whether marriage feast that is fast
developing into a culture merits affirmation or otherwise. Surely, in
any marriage guests, friends and relatives specially who come from
afar must be provided a comfortable stay. But the idea and practice
of marriage feast goes beyond this.
Depending on the size of the groom's village and the of
the bride, if she is from another village, the expense varies. Given
the general economy of the district residents, anything around five
lakhs is a significant figure. Bigger programme would go beyond five
lakhs and modest ones below this figure. But the truth is that even
one lakh is so high for most of the households. Many families run
into debts as they strive hard to provide education to the children
or as an illness hits hard one member of the family. Many more are
just about sufficient to meet their needs. Most people would be
emptying their life long saving if two lakhs get withdrawn from their
purse. Only a small percentage would remain unhurt with few lakhs
spent to provide a marriage feast. No wonder even long ago feast of
merit was such a rare occasion!
A benevolent giver should be affirmed. Seeking honour is
not bad in itself. But when marriage feast becomes a pattern such
that it begins to create pressure on those who are unable to afford
it, then this honourable action becomes questionable. It begins to
put pressure on the society at large when a young man or his
relatives begins to feel being 'left out' without such a feast. Feast
of merit was optional for our ancestors; marriage is not quite like
that. Marriage is widespread across different economic strata. Once
it begins to emerge as a cultural practice such that being 'left out'
is a shame for the family or the groom, the rich ones cannot just
shrug it off and say the poor need not follow the cultural pattern.
The rich and the poor have both contributed to the emerging culture,
and therefore for the sake of the larger society, a different pattern
would have to be set by all the parties.
It is time to make marriage ceremony less expensive –
particularly without a feast. The occasion is special. Yet what makes
it beautiful and joyful is not necessarily the cost. Simplicity has
its own charm. Seeking an honour in a pervasive occasion like
marriage, and which only a tiny section could achieve it without
getting financial hurt is not a desirable path to earning fame and
honour. If generosity is the motive, giving on another occasion that
will not develop into a harmful culture in the near future is more
desirable. In today's age, hosting a marriage feast is not
necessarily the most creative way of showing generosity or sharing
one's joy. If generosity is truly the reason, why not pay off
someone's debt or the school fees of those children whose parents
labour hard in the rain? This is unlikely to materialise because
generosity may not quite be the single reason or even the main reason
– something else too is involved. Yet at the end of the day, given
that the emerging culture of hosting a feast in marriage is becoming
more of a burden for most families, it would be more appropriate for
a responsible citizen to set a different trend. May the tribe of
those who are willing to set a different culture increase!
(This article appears on 9th February, 2015 at Hornbill Express)
No comments:
Post a Comment