Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Spending Money Wisely

This is the sermon that the pastor of the church I go to preached last Sunday. I was very much blessed by the sermon and so I thought of putting it down here. This is not a word to word reproduction of the sermon, but I think these are the points. 

1. Do not buy things IMPULSIVELY. 
( Just because you have money, don't buy things as you see them. See what you need, and then buy them. Avoid unplanned shopping) 

2. Do not live beyond yours MEANS. 
( Do not spend beyond your income. Learn to adjust your lifestyle within your income) 

3. Do not be DECEIVED  by the desire for more. 
( Learn to be content with what you have. Human wants are unlimited; but learn to limit your desire. If you don't you'll change jobs forever, get into the cut-throat competition till you die... you won't be happy.)

4. Do not be a SLAVE to technology. 
( It's okay to possess an old phone, and old car... a television that is not the latest model.) 

Because 

1. We are to HONOUR God with our money. (Prov. 3:9-10)
2. We are to PROVIDE for the needs of our family ( 1 Tim 5:8)
3. We are to PROVIDE for the needs of others ( 1 John 3:17) 
4. PAY our debts ( Rom 13: 8, Ps 37:21)
5 SAVE for our future ( Prov. 30: 24) 

And the Bible further says that

1. The resources we have is not really ours; it belongs to God. 
2. And we are to use the resources wisely
3. And we are to give an account in the end to God.

NB: The pastor has given me permission to share. 

Monday, May 25, 2015

God or No God?

                                                                                A

Does God exist? This is a question that has been debated for ages. One of the arguments in favour of God's existence is the cosmological argument. The argument goes this way: 

1. Whatever begins to exist has a cause
2. The Universe begins to exist
3. Universe has a cause
4. The cause is God. 
5. Hence, God exists. 

Explanation: 
1. This appears rather self explanatory. If I begin to exist, then I must have a cause -- my parents. If my parent begins to exist, then she must have a cause. And so on and so on. 

2. And as one pushes backward, it goes back to the beginning of the universe. Does the universe have a beginning? As of today Big Bang theory is the main cosmological theory. And one cannot go beyond the Big Bang. And it's fair to say that the moment of Big Bang is the moment of the beginning of the universe. 

3. But if the universe has a beginning, then it must have a cause. This is as stated in proposition 1. 

4. The universe that contains mind, matter and energy must be attributed to a cause for its beginning. Since the effect cannot be bigger than the cause, the cause of matter, mind, energy within time-space has to be attributed to as God. 

5. Hence, God exists. 

                                                                                 B

Now if someone does not want to accept this syllogism, there are two other options: 

1. Whatever begins to exist has a cause. 
2. The universe has a cause
3. This cause also has a cause, which again has a cause and so on. 

This position is to affirm infinite regress. 

                                                                                 C

The other position is this: 

1. The universe emerges from nothingness. 

                                                                                 D

About 'nothingness' Aristotle says something to this effect: That which rocks dream about is nothingness. What do non-living objects like rocks and stones dream about? It is nothingness. 

Infinite regress does not sound that appealing. When we talk about infinite regress, we talk about infinity. This is to mean that before we arrive at this present moment i.e now, an infinite unit of time would have elapsed. But how is this possible? Suppose now is t=2015, before arriving at t=2015, there would have to be an infinite unit of time to elapse. But if an infinite amount of time would have to elapse before arriving at t=2015, we would never ever be able to even start. We could only arrive at t=3015 if there was a point of time we could start; counting from infinity, we could never ever arrive at the present. But the fact that we have arrived at the present moment shows that there was a point of time the whole thing started. 

This brings us back to the first option. That God would have been the cause of the universe to exist. This God is a being (with Mind) and there is mystery in this Mind. The fact that He would have been the cause for Big Bang suggests that He is really outside of our understanding of time and space. And this necessitates the element of mystery in our understanding. 

I would say the first option is absurdity; the second impossibility and the third mystery. I prefer the third! 

Saturday, May 23, 2015

Why Must Beef Eaters Go to Pakistan?

The other day BJP leader Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi said that those Indian who wanted to continue eating beef should go to Pakistan. Here is the newspaper link. BJP's intention to get slaughtering of cow banned in not secret. But imposing ban on cow slaughtering is to impose ban on the consumption of beef. This does not come as a surprise because leaders from BJP and its right wing fundamentalist mentor RSS have repeated made similar statements. 

What comes as a surprise is that the statement is coming from Minister of State for Minority Affairs. The ministry is supposed to be looking after the rights and the interest of the religious minorities. And when certain people in the ruling party want to impose its religious agenda, the ministry is supposed to argue back and caution such people that imposition of such religious agenda goes against the secular nature of the state and thus subverts the liberty of the religious minorities. Instead of being faithful to the task the ministry is supposed to be doing, what the Minister does is a compromise of the purpose of its ministry. This is sad state of affair. 

Yes, the senior minister Arun Jaitley has expressed disapproval of the comment. But mere disapproval of the comment is not enough in this regard. Had it come from the minister of other department, that is understandable. But given that this is coming from the Minister of Minority Affair, removing him from this ministry would be the more fitting response from the PM. 

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

Polygamy and the Bible

There Bible contains stories of different heroes and villains, so to speak. Figures like Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses and David are heroes whereas characters like Esau, Jeroboam, Ahab and Judas are villains, so to speak. Many of the heroes mentioned in the Bible had more than one wife. Many of them had concubines. David had possibly eight wives and many concubines. Abraham had Sarah and Hagar at one point of time; and Jacob had both Leah and her sister Rachel as his wives, not to mention the two concubines. As was common during olden days, most of these heroes had multiple wives. Does the Bible condone polygamy?

The Bible has a grand-narrative, a grand-plot. But the Bible also has sub-narratives, sub-plots. These lives of these characters are part of the sub-narrative, sub-plot. Some characters play a more prominent role than certain other characters. So in the story, not only one would read about polygamy, conspiracy, murder, theft etc but also love, compassion, friendship etc. The story of Abraham or Moses or David would have both of these features. But the point is that the main hero of the grand-narrative is not Abraham nor David; it is Jesus Christ. David's life is not entirely good nor entirely bad; so is Abraham's life. Christians look to Jesus as the role model and also listen to his teaching. There can be certain lesson that one can learn from the life of Abraham or Jacob or David or even from the life of Judas or Ahab. But these figures are not divine and they are mortal!

So to know whether Christians endorse polygamy or not, or whether Bible condones polygamy or not,  one must not look at the lives of these heroes. One must go beyond these figures. Look to Jesus Christ for the answer. And in Matthew 19, when Jesus was asked about adultery, he gives an answer by going back to Genesis chapter first and second -- to what God has intended in the creation about marriage. It reads " ... a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one" ( Matthew 19: 5). Jesus means to say that God's intention is that two will become one; not three or four will become one. And by this he means one male and one female (v. 4).

Certain people, after having read about the lives of Abraham or David, thought that the Bible condones polygamy. But this is based on wrong reading of the narrative. Christians look to Jesus for moral lessons!


Saturday, May 16, 2015

Humour About a Phone

Girl: What is the price of that Galaxy Grand?
Salesman: Rs. 20,000.
Girl: OMG!
Girl: What is the price of that I-Phone?
Salesman: OMG, OMG, OMG!


NB: The joke is not mine; picked it up from the WhatsApp message sent by a friend.

Friday, May 15, 2015

Khyoubu Parents' Camp

On 28th and 29th March, 2015 there was a camp at Khyoubu Baptist Church. The camp was to teach couples how to raise kids as well as a build a home. This video is taken towards the end of the session when the speaker asked the couple to seek forgiveness from each other for all the hurt and wrong that they have committed to each other, and also to seek forgiveness from God. 

Sunday, May 10, 2015

Why I-Phone?

IPhone 6 Plus costs above Rs. 50,000. That is a lot of money! 

For a long long time I used the kind of model that costs little over Rs. 1,000. The question was not whether I could afford a more expensive phone or not that made me use that kind of model. The question was what kind of phone do I NEED? Had I needed a phone that has more features, I would make effort to get such a phone. But if I did not need a phone that has more features and would cost Rs. 25,000, and my need would be serve by one that cost little over 1,000, the latter device would work for me. At present I used a particular model that costs around Rs. 2500. This model has WhatsApp facility, which makes conversation much cheaper. Without WhatsApp facility, one has to text message or make a phone call to be in touch. And that used to be expensive. With WhatsApp communication has become much cheaper. Given that WhatsApp has become a need, I got a phone that would have this feature. So if I got my my phone upgraded now, it was driven by my NEED. 

Because of certain reason if I require a phone that would cost Rs. 50,000 I would try to purchase such a phone. But unless the need/requirement arises, I would not want to spend money on buying a more expensive phone. 

There is a car that was purchased almost five years back. I did not go for SUV because I did not NEED such a car. Car became a 'need' because carrying young children with their mother on a bike is not safe. And traveling by bus to certain destination is too inconvenient. And it is turns out cheaper to use one's own car than using taxi/auto. Given these reasons, getting a car was more reasonable than not having one specially when one has a choice whether to have a car or not to have a car. I would have tried to get a bigger car even if it means I would have to pay much more provided I was in need of such a car. But I knew that such a car was not my need. What I needed was just a car. And a small car would fit my need.

With age, one may require a car that gives 'comfort' to the back. Fair enough! With age, one may require a bigger phone so that smaller screen may not be such a constraint on the eyes that are getting weaker. Fair enough! But to purchase things in order to show off is foolish. That is wasting resources. To lead a modest life in a world that is becoming more and more materialistic may not find many takers. But there will always be those who are against wastage; who are against showing off and who are against luxurious lifestyle. Being comfortable or being beautiful or being needs met do not have to veer towards leading a life that is so full of oneself -- not being able to think for others. 

When there are so many poor people out there; so many people who required help... because they are ill or because they are illiterate or because their crop failed and so on and so forth, if I had spent my riches just to get bigger phone, bigger car, bigger house etc. where would I have money to help others? If I lived a more modest life, then my riches could be shared with those who are in need. 'Wasting' money or rather spending money on things not really required is what I wish to avoid. And the reason I try to live this way is because the God that I worship teaches me to 'love my neighbour'. Not an easy teaching, nevertheless an important and a beautiful teaching!


Thursday, May 7, 2015

Chipei Avei Teidei

Chipei teidei avei hinou
Paohao louhoe zhinou leshie
Deimatao vanou ale shisho-a
Mapao nou sou peie
Ale shiliide
Zhinuh bu Khyoubuhi

She nuh maichi ralya vei-a
Zhinou thaimoe zhinou niimoe
Khyoubu teidei vea ale shiyu hae
Mapaonou soupeie
Aleshi liide
Khyoubu teidei hisii

Zion teidei avei haivea
Khyoubu teidei hai leshi shoe
Zhinou ziipa nya
Hriilai buche-e
Mapao nou soupei-e
Aleshi liide
Zhinou bu Khoubuhi.

-- Siile Shipio

Wednesday, May 6, 2015

Human Moral Imperfection and the Desire for Forgiveness

Do you ever struggle with guilt? The guilt that arises because you have done something that is bad or because you have failed to do something that is good. I think all of us would have done things that are bad or would have failed to do things that are good and therefore ought to be done at that point of time, and yet walked away without having to do it. Incidents such as these might occur over and over again. However, the guilt may not strike to every individual as much as it would strike to certain individuals. If you have ever struggled with guilt, it would serve as an evidence that you are not morally perfect; that you have at times being morally imperfect. 

But what about those who do not struggle with guilt? Can we say that they think that they are morally perfect. I don't think any grown person can really say that he or she is morally perfect. The guilt may not strike as hard it has happened to certain other people. In fact, the guilt may not just be there. But to feel guilty or to be aware of being guilty of certain bad actions is not necessarily the only outcome after having done a bad action or failed to have performed a good action. Some people just tell lies without any apparent sense of remorse even when there is no apparent compelling reason to tell a lie. By 'compelling reason' I mean a situation such as this. A friend of yours is hiding in your room. Some people came to ask you if she is hiding in your room. You sense that they intended to kill her with their machete. You are pretty confident that your friend is not wrong. In such a situation, telling a lie to save her would be a compelling reason to lie. So when we go out to the market the taxi driver may lie to us or the shopkeeper may just lie to us without any compelling reason. And when such people lie, they may not appear to have any sense of guilt. But that does not really mean that such lie is a good thing; a lie is still a lie. For such people, a lie is not followed by a sense of remorse. 

Upon probing if such a lie is bad or good, the one who lied would admit that such a lie is not a good thing. In fact if the truth is found out and the person is confronted, it is highly likely that the person would be put in a defensive mode or even be ashamed of the lie. But often a lie is not caught, and even if caught direct confrontation is avoided. And even when confronted some people would try to cover up with another lie. And this evading continues. But again evading the truth is rather like admitting implicitly that a lie is considered a lie and it is not good. 

But all of this is to do with individual's perception of good and bad. The idea of good and bad goes beyond what the individual understands for oneself. You jump the traffic light; the policeman will catch and imposes fine on you. You cannot really say that you are not aware of the traffic rule and therefore you should be let off the hook. Even when you are being honestly ignorant, you broke the law, and you must pay penalty. Now again we can argue saying that not every legislated norm is good. Fair enough! Definitely depending on the kind of government in power, laws sometime are legislated unfairly. For example, a dictator may refuse voting right to certain ethnic group just because they are different or he may even suspend the Parliament. The law is passed in such cases, yet given a free and fair condition to argue back and forth, one can establish a case that such a legislated norm is not right. So there are situations when one can say that laws are not good. However, it still remains that there are also quite a lot items of legal norms that are good and must be honored. Breaking such honorable laws, knowingly or unknowingly, entails moral imperfection on the part of the individual. Guilt may follow or not, but moral imperfection is a logical consequence of such violation of legislated norms! 

In so many literary pieces, one can read cases of men and women who have grappled with guilt because of having done something bad. For example, king David in the Bible felt terribly bad because of the kind of bad actions that he committed. First he committed adultery with a woman named Bathsheba. That was bad. But he realized that this act might possibly be found out. And therefore he had her husband killed in a battle. Being the king he was able to hatch such a plan! That was really bad. David struggled with guilt and he expressed the guilt. David did not think that he was morally perfect. Mahatma Gandhi felt terribly sorry over the fact that he could not be with his dad at his dying hour. He was with his had but then he had gone to be with his wife when his dad would have breathed his last breathe. And so when his dad passed away, he would have been sleeping with his wife. He felt that it was a moral failure on his part. Gandhi did not consider himself morally perfect. These are great figures, revered by thousands and millions of people across generations. They thought they had their moral failures. What about you? What about me? I don't think I am morally perfect. There are things that I had done and guilt did not strike immediately. There are things that I had done and guilt just struck so quickly. Examples. When I was in school, probably in the half-yearly exam of 9th standard, I did not get good result as I had thought of. I was afraid to show at home because I got bad marks. I fudged my result and put principal's signature myself. I showed at home that I got good result. Nobody at home came to know about it. I lied! I lied about my mark few years later again. My result did not show as I had anticipated. I fudged my mark sheet again.  I lied! Years later, I realized that what I had done was not right. Guilt struck me only years later, not immediately. But because guilt struck me so hard I discarded my fudged mark sheet and got hold of the real mark sheet. The time when guilt struck me so quickly was when I had watched porn videos. This is not something that took years for me to let the guilt surface in me. The guilt surfaced right after having spent sometime watching porn. And these cases show, at least to myself, that I am not morally perfect. But these are just a handful of examples. If I have to list about my moral failures, it's just so many. 

And I do think that each one of us has moral failures. In fact, to insist that one is morally perfect sounds rather like lying to oneself. But given this pervasive moral failure and therefore guilt, how do we get forgiveness or how do we sort this out? After all grappling with guilt for ages and ages is not good. It does lot of harm to oneself, if not to other people around us. For example, in Shakespeare's Macbeth, we read of lady Macbeth having to hallucinate because of her struggle with guilt. She had played a key role in getting the king murdered. And now guilt is catching up with her. Had she gotten rid of this guilt sooner, she would not have to face this predicament. But she did not get rid of this guilt. And now her life is in ruin because of her guilt. It is an extremely  wise way of living not to lie to oneself, and therefore it is important to get rid of guilt. 

If we broke traffic rule, we pay penalty. But what do we do if there is moral failure and therefore we struggle with guilt? Go and reconcile with whom I have wronged! But if I feel guilty because I have watched porn, to whom do I go to get rid of my guilt? If I felt guilty because I had fudged my marks, to whom do I go to get rid of my guilt? When king David committed sin, the first person he went to was God. He thought that since God is his Lord, to whom he is to be accountable to, he must first set things right with God. And so he asks for forgiveness from God. I believe that since God is the giver of my breathe and the moral law within, I owe my life to him and my reconciliation must take place with him first. Given this factor, I ask God for forgiveness. God is a loving God, and when I seek forgiveness, I believe, he forgives. When I see forgiveness from my mother, she forgives, because she loves me. Why won't God who loves me forgives me when I seek forgiveness! Anyone who loves you will forgive you, if you seek forgiveness. If I had stolen something from X, of course, it is good to settle with X. So if something of this sort is required to settle things, settle it. But not all of moral failure is of this sort. And when it is not of this sort, I think settling with God is what really matters! 

There is moral failure on my part from time to time. And each time I come to God. I don't want this moral failure. Yet there is a strong pull in me that drags me down and so sometimes I fall. But each time I get up and say sorry to God, he forgives me. I don't think I will ever be able to live a morally perfect life, a life that is morally perfect for, say, a year. But then the cross of Jesus Christ tells me that my sins are being forgiven and that I ought not to commit sins again. 

I imagine that the world would be a better place if all humans would address the guilt that one struggles with. If we grapple with guilt, then the possibility of not doing the same action is there. The possibility of not stealing again, the possibility of not killing again, the possibility of not lying again and so on. Given that guilt elicits in us a response that prevents us from committing the same bad action, I think, it is fair to say that awaking in us a feeling of guilt for the bad actions we have done in the past is good. Having a guilt free life is better compared to a guilt ridden life! The problem is thus not so much about not having a solution do deal with guilt because forgiveness is available so as to get rid of guilt; the problem is rather that many people do not wake from their 'moral slumber' and are not able to receive forgiveness.

Blessed are those who desired forgiveness because of their guilt and have received forgiveness!