If the state government employs
more people, more money would be utilised to pay salary to the
employees. With less number of employees, the government would have
more money to spend in other areas. Since public good like roadways
and sewerage system are essential to sustainable development, with
more money available government can increase spending in these areas.
Given this simple arithmetic, government should not employ more than
what it requires to run the administration.
One of the twists to the
arguments is that those who are responsible to run the administration
benefit privately when more people are employed as government
servants. Such overcrowding in government departments harm the people
in general, yet those responsible for the recruitment get far richer
than they used to be. The income of the officials through bribery
runs in terms of several millions for many of the recruitment
programmes into government service. The rate is 'fixed' for a
constable or for a Sub Inspector for the police department and even
for a primary teacher or for a graduate teacher in schools. Since
private companies hardly invest in the state, and government
employment is the considered the only source of stable and decent
income, educated unemployed are coerced into paying bribes to get
employed. Given the massive amount of money involved in such
day-light robbery', those in responsible position are tempted to
recruit more than the required number. (This is day-light robbery
because it is taking what ought not to be taken during the day as
opposed to robbers taking what ought not to be taken during the
night.) But this overcrowding of government departments results in
harming the larger community. This is a practice that should come to
an immediate halt.
Government employment is not the
answer to solving the economic bottleneck facing the state. A
government employee can at the most sustain his or her family. Since
government will never be in a position to provide each individual in
a family a job in its different departments, it has to expand its
vision beyond providing jobs in the tertiary sector or the service
sector. Even when private companies come in, white collar job will
never be sufficiently available nor can tertiary sector alone
sustains the economy.
To provide jobs in the secondary
and the primary sector, and induce overall economic growth in the
state, state government in the North East region, notably Manipur,
has to increase spending on road connectivity. With proper roadways,
those in the hills can provide agricultural produce to those in towns
and city at a much cheaper rate. This will benefit both the parties –
dwellers in the rural area as well as dwellers in the urban areas.
Healthcare providers and teachers will find it much easier to provide
services to far flung villages when road connectivity is in place.
Inefficient service sector plaguing the rural area is largely due to
bad roads. As of today, most cases of medical emergency require
dashing off to the state capital. When a patient from a village has
to be carried on bamboo stretcher specially during rainy season till
pucca road, which for certain villages will be for half a day's walk,
it may be too late. To think that a corrupt politician is responsible
for the death of such patients every year is haunting! For states
like Manipur, Nagaland or Mizoram which is largely composed of rugged
hilly terrain, unless government spends in massive amount for road
connectivity, much of the hilly terrain will remain cut off from the
outside world. Thus, ensuring development and healthcare largely rest
with government machinery. This spending can come only from the
government; no private individuals will have money big enough to
effect change in this respect unlike one can do so in education and
healthcare.
A
democratic state exists on certain moral principles. And it is a
moral obligation of the state that public good such as proper road
connectivity is provided to all the villages in the state. More
important than employment in the public sector is road connectivity
to ensure overall development in the state. For too long government
has failed to live up to its moral obligation. To fulfilling this
moral obligation, it is high time that government increases its
spending on roadway programmes.
( The Hornbill Express, 29th December, 2014)
No comments:
Post a Comment